Independent Living Fund Court Challenge Lost
- 24 Apr
Five disabled people have taken the government to court over the decision to remove the Independent Living Fund (ILF) and lost the battle.
Their lawyers have said that the consultation process to remove the £320 million funding was unlawful, but a judge has dismissed this and they plan to appeal the decision.
The money given to disabled people is to aid an independent life. The average amount given is £300 per week, and is used to enable disabled people to employ assistants to help them with their personal needs, and to work and play an active part in their communities.
The government have proposed that when they remove the fund in 2015, local councils will take over the short fall, but campaigners say this is unlikely as they already have an under funded social care fund.
The five people who have lost the court case are among around 19,000 who receive the ILF, and claimants fear that this will mean disabled people could be forced into residential care or trapped at home as a result of the abolition of the fund.
One of the five applicants, Gabriel Pepper, from East London, has said the cuts are "a vicious attack on the disabled".
Campaigners have warned that closing the fund and transferring it to local authorities, will have a catastrophic impact on the independence and life chances of severely disabled people.
Richard Hawkes, chief executive of the disability charity Scope, said:
Twenty thousand disabled people will lose support for the basics in life when the independent living fund closes. The government presumes that the shortfall in this care and support will be met by councils, but this just isn't the case.
Local care and support for disabled people is already underfunded to the tune of £1.2bn and councils are already struggling to cope.
Expecting councils to pick up the tab when they are facing the biggest funding cuts in history is an impossible ask. Disabled people will lose out as a result.
Not getting the support to wash, dress and leave your home is unacceptable. The government needs to invest more in social care to prevent disabled people being condemned to a life without basic dignity and invisible from society.
Image source: http://www.morguefile.com/archive/display/71078
- 28 Aug
Figures find thousands of benefit claimants died after found fit for work
Over 80 people a month have died shortly after being declared “fit to work” prompting campaigners to call for an overhaul of the government’s welfare system, reports the Guardian.Figures from...
- 24 Aug
Disability campaigners concerned over benefit shakeups
The Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is set to announce new reforms to sickness benefits in the hope to get more people into work, reports the Guardian.It is expected the Mr Duncan Smith...
- 07 Aug
Single parents are being hit by benefit cuts
Government statistics detailing who has been affected by the policy have found that in May 2015 49% were single parents with children under the age of five, reports the Guardian.It is being said that...
- 30 Jul
Government to review helping benefit claimants back into work
Led by Professor Dame Carol Black, the inquiry will consider the case for linking people who are entitled to benefits with accepting appropriate treatment or support, reports 24dash.The review's...
- 23 Jul
Call for review of benefits delivery
The inquiry will look at the problems that could occur when benefits are underpaid or delayed, reports 24dash. The Committee invites written evidence on: Frank Field MP, chair of the committee,...
- 15 May
11,400 tenants could be affected by new benefits cut
Inside Housing have analysed data from the government's Stat-Xplore website and has found that 11,449 social housing tenants are set to be affected by the governments plans to remove housing benefit...
- 24 Mar
Deaths due to benefit sanctions should have independent investigations
A report into benefit sanctions by the Work and Pensions Committee has said that suicides linked to sanctions should be scrutinised in a similar manner to deaths in police custody, reports Inside...
- 11 Mar
Charity finds benefit sanctions regime to be flawed
A report conducted for Crisis by the Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research at Sheffield Hallam University found that benefit claimants were subject to a ‘postcode lottery' on whether or...
- 30 Oct
Cuts to employment and support allowance benefits
With these cuts it could see new claimants being given just 50p more per week than people who are on job seekers allowance, reports the BBC. The Department for Work and Pensions have said the ESA...
- 10 Oct
Proposed benefit rule labelled ‘worse than poor law'
The Social Security Advisory Committee is currently cons ulting on the proposals which George Osborne first announced in June 2013, reports Inside Housing.The seven day wait would occur on top of the...
Responding to the DWP Consultation: Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing "It was well-run, in a good location, and very useful. I've only one suggestion; as the session went on it would perhaps have been useful for bullet points of general agreement about what should be in the sector response to be displayed and added to as the session went on, maybe on a flip chart. Regarding your response paper, I particularly like the answer you give to question 9. In fact the general: "if it ain't broke don't fix it" response could be pushed harder." M.P. - Adref Ltd