NHS Better Care Fund delayed after Whitehall review
- 07 May
A review has revealed that claims for policy to bring together health and social care services ‘don't stack up'.
The government's policy to help stop the NHS from becoming overwhelmed has been delayed after a confidential Whitehall review has concluded that it would not work as hoped.
The Better Care Fund, of £3.8bn a year, was meant to launch last week, however its introduction was surrounded in doubt after the Cabinet Office said there was little or no detail about how the expected savings would be delivered, reports the Guardian.
A Whitehall source said the Cabinet Office believed that the claims for the Better Care Fund did not stack up and wanted "a lot more work done on the policy".
The fund was meant to begin in April next year and aims to cut overcrowding in A&E units and the number of people admitted for hospital treatment. The Cabinet Office has voiced concern that hospitals haven't been consulted enough about plans.
A Whitehall source familiar with the situation said: "The Better Care Fund is based on the idea that if you invest to build up services outside of hospitals based on integrated care, that will help you to ultimately save money from the hospital budget. But the plans produced so far don't show in detail where savings will be achieved as a result of the investment, or that hospitals will be able to reduce their spending. Because they don't, the Cabinet Office don't think the plans produced so far are credible enough and don't have enough information in them about how the savings will be made, or detailed enough forecasts."
A Conservative health spokesman said: "This government is finally doing what the last government talked about but never delivered: joining up the health and social care systems. The Better Care plans start from April 2015 but we asked for early versions to be completed a year early so we could check their level of ambition and deliverability, which is what is happening."
Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary, said: "Under this government, health policy seems to lurch from one shambles to another. This is further evidence that you can't trust the Tories with the NHS. After a botched £3bn re-organisation, the NHS simply could not afford to rush ahead with these back-of-the-envelope plans. This was a panicked response to Labour's plans for full integration. It was never properly thought through and was set on a dangerous and unrealistic timetable. This news will only deepen confusion in the NHS about government policy. It is suffering from a real lack of leadership when it desperately needs a clear direction at a time of tight finances. David Cameron and Jeremy Hunt must urgently clarify the status of the Better Care Fund."
Richard Hawkes, chief executive of the disability charity Scope, said: "Ministers have built up the Better Care Fund as the answer to the care crisis ... Chronic underfunding and year-on-year rationing of care have left the system on its knees. Earmarking NHS cash for care was a bold move to stimulate innovative ways of working. But for the Better Care Fund to live up to the billing, we need to see a commitment to serious, ongoing investment and a strong focus on preventing people becoming isolated and slipping into crisis. The government's flagship care bill could make a real difference. But the reforms are at real risk."
What do you think of this? Tweet us your comments @suppsolutions
Image source: http://www.freeimages.com/photo/386434
- 10 Mar
THE STATUS OF THE SOCIAL CARE SECTOR REQUIRES IMPROVEMENTs
It was also found that the social care sector has the following characteristics:Social care seems like an adjunct to the NHS instead of being an important service in its own right. While the...
- 29 Apr
Scottish Welfare Fund grants see a 13% rise in applications
Data from the Scottish Government has shown that the number of applications to councils under the Scottish Welfare Fund has increased by 13% in just the last year, reports The Courier.Over the most...
- 16 Jan
Local welfare assistance funds held back by councils
The Centre for Responsible Credit using Freedom of Information requests carried out a study which found that 127 local authorities spent 52.8% of their £148.5m sharing of the local welfare...
- 13 Jan
Landlord scheme has saved the NHS thousands of pounds
The groups - Oldham Council, Oldham Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and Oldham Housing Investment Partnership - consist of 10 social landlords who co-invested in the ‘Warm Homes Oldham'...
- 05 Jan
Calls for NHS funding
Stevens also called for an end to the ‘boom-bust' approach. Stevens told the Financial Times he hoped for more annual funding in addition to the £2bn lifeline that the Chancellor, George Osborne,...
- 30 Dec
New Fundraising Campaign Launched by Hospital Charity
The campaign encourages its supporters to partake in its ‘Every £1 Counts' fundraiser by making a donation and sharing a ‘pound selfie' on Facebook and Twitter throughout January.The charity are...
- 08 Dec
Home care sector facing crisis due to workers’ wages
A study by contractor Mears and the Local Government Information Unit have reported that councils should ensure they pay providers to enable them to pay ‘at least' minimum wage salaries.Liberal...
- 06 Oct
Supported housing service for women and their children has received funding for community garden
Endeavour Housing Associaiton's Rainham House temporary accommodation service has been awarded funding for their Roots and Shoots garden project. Working in partnership with community allotment...
- 03 Oct
Social landlords urged to make do without grants
Speaking to Inside Housing at the Conservative Party conference this week, Mr Lewis said: "If housing associations want to survive without government funding, that's a good thing."He said it would...
- 02 Oct
Supporting People budget cut by £10m by the Welsh government
A draft budget shows the government announcing plans to cut the budget for Supporting People from £134.4m in 2014/15 to £124.4m in 2015/16 which is a drop of 7.4%, reports Inside Housing.Despite...
Responding to the DWP Consultation: Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing "I thought this briefing was very good and very useful. The presentation was clear, well argued and I always find Michael gives me food for thought even if I don't agree with everything he says. I really like the way he facilitates a discussion in the room and I learn as much from other participants as I do from the presenter which is always good. Right length, right tone." R.P. - Richmond Fellowship