Is 'disproportionate' force on burglars any alteration to current law?

  • Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has announced that the law will be changed so that householders who over-react when confronted by burglars are to get more legal protection.

    At present the law includes 'reasonable force' for the householder to protect themselves or others, as long as the act honestly and instinctively, even if the intruder dies as a result of the householders actions; it is still lawful to act in reasonable self-defence, but with current law prosecution could result from "very excessive and gratuitous force", such as attacking someone who is unconscious.

    However, Grayling has announced that this will be changed to include disproportionate force when tackling intruders, and could be included in the crime bill this Autumn. He has said that he wants to dispel doubts about this matter once and for all.

    The current law allows householders to use "reasonable force", and they are fully supported by this, provided that:

    • they acted instinctively
    • they feared for their safety or that of others, and acted based on their perception of the threat (emphasis mine) faced and the scale of that threat
    • they acted to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained
    • the level of force used was not excessive or disproportionate in the circumstances as they viewed them.

    "Grossly disproportionate" force, with the example given by Grayling of stabbing to death a burglar who had already been knocked unconscious, would still be against the law.

    Section 76.7 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 requires the court to take into account that:

    "a person acting for a legitimate purpose may not be able to weigh to a nicety the exact measure of any necessary action; evidence of a person's having only done what the person honestly and instinctively thought was necessary for a legitimate purpose constitutes strong evidence that only reasonable action was taken by that person for that purpose".

    Based on there only being just 11 prosecutions in 15 years for people tackling intruders in any premises, and only 7 of these in their own home, between 1990 and 2005, Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosecutions, has previously noted:

    There are many cases, some involving death, where no prosecutions are brought.

    We would only ever bring a prosecution where we thought that the degree of force was unreasonable in such a way that the jury would realistically convict. So these are very rare cases and history tells us that the current test works very well.

    David Cameron has said that the change is to provide "certainty":

    There has been uncertainty that if a burglar comes into your home, people aren't sure about what they are and are not allowed to do.

    Mr Grayling will tell Conservative delegates in Birmingham:

    Being confronted by an intruder in your own home is terrifying, and the public should be in no doubt that the law is on their side.

    Householders who act instinctively and honestly in self-defence are victims of crime and should be treated that way.

    So if the reason's given by Cameron and Grayling for the change in the law are already covered in the present law, then surely publicising a change in the law will in fact create the confusion for what is now allowed, and what is "gross disproportionate force"?

    At the conference, Grayling will also stress his commitment to rehabilitation of offenders to cut re-offending rates using the payment by results programme involving charities and private firms.

    However, he intends to toughen up community sentences to ensure that every one of the orders handed out to 220,000 offenders each year will include a "proper punishment". Ken Clarke, the previous Justice Secretary, had plans for a rehabilitation revolution, to which Grayling says:

    Yes, we should be looking to rehabilitate. But if someone has committed an offence, they also need to receive a proper punishment for it.

    That's part of how we can tackle re-offending and make these sentences really effective.





Related articles

  • Read More

    Prisons told to adjust for older inmates

    Ombudsman Nigel Newcomen says prisons will have to take on "care home and even hospice" roles in future, reports the BBC. He said: "It is remarkable that the fastest growing segment of the prison...

  • Read More

    Charities are best at reducing re-offending

    A report by charity thinktank New Philanthropy Capital has found that 28% of charity projects have helped to reduce reoffending compared to 19% of private companies, reports the Guardian.The report...

  • Read More

    It could become illegal to deny offenders legal aid

    It could become illegal to deny prisoners in England and Wales legal aid so that they are able to effectively challenge the conditions they are held under, rules the court of appeal, reports the...

  • Read More

    Offender’s rehabilitation is delayed by legal aid restrictions

    The court of appeal has been told that thousands of prisoners are being prevented from starting rehabilitation due to them being denied legal aid for parole board hearings, reports the...

  • Read More

    New supported accommodation for ex-offenders in Birmingham

    Trident Reach the People Charity's new Reach House has been built to provide 24-hour supported accommodation for young offenders to help support them getting back into the community after their...

  • Read More

    Staff working with young offenders criticised

    A report by three inspection bodies has said that staff aimed at helping reduce re-offending in young offenders are "too often suspicious of each other" reports the BBC.The report, by the Care...

  • Read More

    Family homes are needed to help offenders re-offending

    A study by HM Inspectorate of Prisons, HM Inspectorate of Probation and Ofsted had found that almost one in five prisoners did not know where they would be living once they left jail, reports Inside...

  • Read More

    Ex-offenders ‘lacking home and job'

    An inspection into resettlement provision for adult prisoners had followed 80 offenders after they left prison. Chief Inspector of Prisons Nick Hardwick said that it found the role of a prisoner's...

  • Read More

    Offenders placed in prison for a day in a bid to cut re-offending

    The Centre for Social Justice has urged the government to look to the US where this approach appears to work. The report has said that a third of people given community sentences re-offended within a...

  • Read More

    Inspection finds offenders with learning disabilities are not being supported

    The inspection looking into the treatment of offenders with learning disabilities within the criminal justice systems was conducted by HM Inspectorate of Probation, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary,...

Responding to the DWP Consultation:  Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing "It was well-run, in a good location, and very useful.  I've only one suggestion; as the session went on it would perhaps have been useful for bullet points of general agreement about what should be in the sector response to be displayed and added to as the session went on, maybe on a flip chart. Regarding your response paper, I particularly like the answer you give to question 9.  In fact the general: "if it ain't broke don't fix it" response could be pushed harder." M.P. - Adref Ltd


Briefing Signup