MPs express concern that bedroom tax could cost more than it saves
- 26 Mar
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) says the cut to benefits could cost more as people are made homeless or forced to move into the more expensive private sector.
They have also warned that direct payments could result in a sharp rise in evictions when introduced as part of Universal Credit later this year, and overall could combine to have a severe impact on low income households.
The PAC have expressed concern that the amount of people who will be negatively affected by up coming benefit caps and bedroom tax has not be calculated accurately, and could result in more money being spent on services to compensate this, such as an increase in homelessness.
This could end up costing more money, instead of saving it as intended, and the government will need to react quickly if the benefit cut for social housing tenants results in rises in rent arrears and homelessness.
The report says:
Social housing providers are concerned these changes will increase arrears and bad debts because tenants will no longer be able to afford rents or take responsibility for making payments themselves.
Committee chair, Labour MP Margaret Hodge, said that the government needs to have a plan for what actions they will take as a response to problems caused by the changes.
The Department of Work and Pensions says it can't accurately predict the effects of its housing benefit changes either on individuals or on the housing supply.
Instead it will rely on a 'wait and see' approach and monitor changes in homelessness, rent levels and arrears so that, where there is a need, it can intervene and respond.
But even small reductions in housing benefit can have a severe impact on the finances of the poorest people.
Experience from the past suggests that stopping direct payments to social landlords will simply lead to an increase in arrears and evictions.
At the same time some tenants will face higher rents under the Affordable Homes programme, which will also increase the housing benefit bill, offsetting some of the savings intended by housing benefit changes.
The government says although the change should reduce the housing bill, it is to correct an imbalance with the private sector, as it brings housing benefit for social housing tenants in line with its provision in the private sector, where this cut is already in place.
It is also intended to reduce the social housing waiting list and move those out of social housing with spare rooms, so those who are overcrowded would have more options of larger housing.
A DWP spokesman said:
We expect people to respond in different ways to the changes to the Spare Room Subsidy - some will move and some will make up the difference in their rent by moving into work, or increasing their hours.
But when in England alone there are nearly two million households on the social housing waiting list and over a quarter of a million tenants are living in overcrowded homes, this measure is needed to make better use of our housing stock.
We are closely monitoring the reforms to ensure councils are informing people about the changes, and spending the extra £390million we have provided to support their residents.
- 08 Nov
NHS BOSS SETS OUT A CASE FOR CASH BOOST
The speech by Mr Stevens at the NHS Providers' annual conference of health managers is being made at the time when three reputable health think-thanks- the Health Foundation, the King's Fund and the...
- 09 Jun
THERESA MAY PLEDGES TO REPLACE THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 1983
According to Ms May, the new bill would introduce the following:According to the Tories, the proposals were described as the biggest change to mental health treatment law in over 30 years.Ms May...
- 30 May
THE PRESENT FIRST PRIME MINISTER OF SCOTLAND IS TO PLEDGE AGAINST ANY PLANS TO PRIVATISE THE NHS
It is also expected that Sturgeon will do the following as proof of her party's commitment to fighting against further austerity:Sturgeon said this before Tuesday's manifesto launch:"While the polls...
- 17 Mar
402 MILLION POUNDS WILL BE INVESTED IN COUNCILS WITH THE GREATEST HOMELESSNESS DEMAND FROM APRIL 2017
Presently, funding is only used for homeless households and not for the prevention of homelessness in the first instance.The funding by the Department for Communities and Local Government is set to...
- 15 Mar
RULES AROUND PERSONAL INDEPENDENCE PAYMENTS MAY CHANGE ON THURSDAY
Ministers have advised chief executives of over 30 charities which claimed that people will be left without vital financial support, to restrict access to a disability benefit.The Disability Benefits...
- 06 Mar
THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN URGED BY THE BMA TO INCREASE HEALTH SPENDING BY 10 BILLION POUNDS
This increase in health spending to a proportion of GDP that matched that of the 10 leading economies across Europe could pay for at least 35,000 extra beds a day and many more GP's, according to the...
- 05 Sep
MANY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REFUGES AT RISK OF CLOSING DUE TO HOUSING BENEFIT CAP
Women who have been victims of domestic violence as well as their children are at risk of falling into the hands of their violent partners if the government caps housing benefit in the social sector...
- 03 Sep
Data on disability benefits refused by DWP
DWP officials have refused a second request for basic information on disability benefits using the “Section 22” exemption they used previously, reports The Independent.The Department had been...
- 02 Sep
UN to investigate how welfare reforms will affect disability rights
A disability charity in Scotland has said it’s been contacted by the UN’s Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as part of an inquiry into Britain’s treatment of people with...
- 01 Sep
Benefit cuts affecting 48,500 families in Liverpool
Analysis from Liverpool City Council has found that around 48,500 households are likely to lose their benefits due to new government reforms, reports the Liverpool Echo. Councillor Jane Corbett has...
Responding to the DWP Consultation: Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing "I thought this briefing was very good and very useful. The presentation was clear, well argued and I always find Michael gives me food for thought even if I don't agree with everything he says. I really like the way he facilitates a discussion in the room and I learn as much from other participants as I do from the presenter which is always good. Right length, right tone." R.P. - Richmond Fellowship