Strategic advice & funding for housing, care & support providers

Contact us now to discuss your requirements

    An investigation has found that NHS leadership tried to keep plans to cut hospital services in England, the BBC reports.

    According to the King’s Fund, NHS England told local managers to keep the plans “out of the public domain” and avoid requests for information.

    Forty-four reviews of local services have been set up across the country and interviews were carried out by King’s Fund with staff involved in four reviews known as Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs). Proposals have also been drawn:

    Interviews were carried out by King’s Fund with staff involved in STPs and the following findings were made:

    • The closure of A&E’s or
    • The closure of a whole hospital
    • Managers were advised on how to reject freedom of information requests which some disagreed with and concurred that it would be greatly detrimental to running the process
    • The above means that views of the public and frontline staff have been hugely absent in the process so far

    More details on what is involve have not yet emerged.

    Chris Ham, the chief executive of King’s Fund said this process is not in line with established “rules” of good engagement and consultation.

    He also said that the “the right thing to do” is to review NHS services but also expressed his worry about the lack of funds to successfully execute this.

    What do you think?

    Please tweet comments @suppsolutions

    November 14, 2016 by Abimbola Duro-David Categories: Care And Support

    Latest Briefing

    Introduction The National Statement of Expectations for Supported Housing (NSE) was finally published on 20 October 2020, five years after the 2015 Comprehensive Spending Review suggested regulatory and oversight changes were needed, although in 2018 the government >>>


    Customer endorsement

    Responding to the DWP Consultation:  Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing

    "I thought this briefing was very good and very useful.  The presentation was clear, well argued and I always find Michael gives me food for thought even if I don't agree with everything he says.  I really like the way he facilitates a discussion in the room and I learn as much from other participants as I do from the presenter which is always good. Right length, right tone."

    R.P. - Richmond Fellowship

    Quick Contact