Over a million sickness benefit applicants found to be â€˜fit for work'
Figures by the Department for Work and Pensions found that a million people who applied for sickness benefit were fit for work.
The DWP claims that 980,400 people were judged capable of work between 2008 and March 2013; 32% of new applicants for Employment and Support Allowance. Over a million others withdrew their claims after interviews.
Disability campaigners have said that the work tests were “ridiculously harsh and extremely unfair”. A spokesman for Disability Rights UK has said that many of those passed fit will not be capable of entering the workplace due to physical or mental health problems. “They are finding people fit for work when they aren’t and they are not even giving them the support they need to get a job. It is a disgrace,” he told BBC News.
Work Capability Assessments aims to judge how a person’s condition limits their ability to work, rather than discussing how eligible for benefits one may be due to a certain impairment.
Minister of State for Disabled People Mike Penning said: “As part of the government’s long-term economic plan, it is only fair that we look at whether people can do some kind of work with the right support – rather than just writing them off on long-term sickness benefits, as has happened in the past. With the right support, many people with an illness, health condition or disability can still fulfil their aspiration to get or stay in work, allowing them to provide for themselves and their family.”
The DWP says that people who withdrew their claim after face-to-face interviews with officials returned to work, recovered or claimed a benefit “more appropriate to their situation.”
Introduction The National Statement of Expectations for Supported Housing (NSE) was finally published on 20 October 2020, five years after the 2015 Comprehensive Spending Review suggested regulatory and oversight changes were needed, although in 2018 the government >>>
Responding to the DWP Consultation: Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing
"It was well-run, in a good location, and very useful. I've only one suggestion; as the session went on it would perhaps have been useful for bullet points of general agreement about what should be in the sector response to be displayed and added to as the session went on, maybe on a flip chart. Regarding your response paper, I particularly like the answer you give to question 9. In fact the general: "if it ain't broke don't fix it" response could be pushed harder."
M.P. - Adref Ltd