Report finds bedroom tax failed to solve under-occupancy
A report has revealed that the bedroom tax has failed to solve the under-occupancy problem in the social housing sector.
The report titled, ‘Here and There: One year of the Bedroom Tax’, has been composed by six housing associations and is the first of its kind to analyse a complete years’ worth of data on the impact of the governments under-occupancy policy, reports 24dash.
It reveals that almost three quarters of people who have been affected are unable to downsize due to a shortage of smaller homes and housing associations are now struggling to let larger homes due to demand plummeting. It also shows that arrears among tenants affected rose initially but steadied after housing associations invested in extra staff so that tenants were supported with money and benefits advice.
The report was written by Aragon Housing Association, South Northants Homes, both part of Grand Union Housing Group, Aldwyck Housing Group, Daventry District Housing, Soha and Howard Cottage Housing Association.
Alan Humphreys, chief executive of Grand Union Housing Group, said: “The fact remains that nearly three quarters of people who were affected by the bedroom tax remain unable to downsize because of a chronic shortage of smaller homes. We are still seeing how the bedroom tax has had a disproportionate impact on a small number of our tenants. That does not achieve what the government set out to do, which was to make better use of the housing stock, and to ease over-crowding in our areas, and indicates that there is perhaps not the demand from larger families.”
Introduction The National Statement of Expectations for Supported Housing (NSE) was finally published on 20 October 2020, five years after the 2015 Comprehensive Spending Review suggested regulatory and oversight changes were needed, although in 2018 the government >>>
Responding to the DWP Consultation: Housing Benefit Reform - Supported Housing
"It was well-run, in a good location, and very useful. I've only one suggestion; as the session went on it would perhaps have been useful for bullet points of general agreement about what should be in the sector response to be displayed and added to as the session went on, maybe on a flip chart. Regarding your response paper, I particularly like the answer you give to question 9. In fact the general: "if it ain't broke don't fix it" response could be pushed harder."
M.P. - Adref Ltd